Lou Gentile Show (Part 3)
December 23, 2004
Nancy only taped her side of the Interview.
The complete interview is available on the Lou Gentile web site, to subscribed members.
A brief paraphrase of the question or comment made by Lou has been inserted.
The first half of the Interview was discussing the content of the web page prepared for the show, content at the link Lou!
This is a long interview, on more than one web page, continuing links to next page at bottom.
LOU: [Got 10 questions here from JohnIsEvil. We can go through them quickly.]
NANCY: Hey, hi. Sure. They probably have been answered a few dozen times. Because I know JohnIsEvil, he posts on the GodlikeProduction message
board, and I don’t know what his list of question is, but periodically people will slam in with 50 things, ‘she’s never answered this’. Periodically I answer
them, but 2 days later, it’s ‘she’s never answered this’, and so I suspect it’s more of that.
LOU: [Your predictions are never right, 100% wrong, you have no evidence whatsoever backing up your claims.]
NANCY: Well this is a very poor quality question. he web site has USGS global quakes that happen at the face and dark side, since May 2003,
photographs which a lot of people can say ‘oh, they just made them up PhotoShop or whatever, but there is examples of 100% failed predictions being
wrong, I think we had one just tonight at the start, talking about that the Rover would be allowed to succeed, and if it was helping further the Awakening, in
other words, awareness of life elsewhere which is what the Awakening is, the alien presence is real, that it would be allowed and even supported. And here
we have the Rover succeeding, going past its battery life, etc, so that’s a prediction that just came true, among all the others in the ZetaTalk accuracy
section, which apparently this gentleman has never looked at. So, I would like to point out also, that most of what you’re taught in the Universities, and
which NASA claims is true, isn’t supported by any kind of evidence either. The Big Bang, the Oort Cloud, even when facts prove them otherwise like solar
magnetism flips every 11 years and their own Ulysses probe went around and proved the Zetas right and them wrong, they’re still telling you that the solar
magnetism flips every 11 years. And even though they say Tunguska was a meteor and the Russian went out there and said there is no evidence of meteor
activity. In fact it looks like a gas explosion, like a released gas from underground chambers, supporting what the Zetas had said earlier, that it was a break
in the permafrost from an earthquake that allowed methane gas to rise, rise up in the heavens and get lit by some lightning where it appeared to flash back
to Earth as it burned. Supporting ZetaTalk, but you’re still told that Tunguska was a meteor crash. So he’s asking, he’s making untrue statements, very
poor quality. Let’s hope that the rest of the 10 are aren’t of that quality.
LOU: [Your photos show Planet X in different places, how is that possible?]
NANCY: Well they don’t. You look at the time, and where it’s moving. I do an Ecliptic studies in the Photos section, which I encourage people to go and
look at. One of the sections is where I do an Ecliptic study, I say ‘OK, this was taken in Italy, in the morning, and here’s where the Ecliptic and
where is Planet X in relation to the Ecliptic’. Then we have something happening in Australia, perhaps, and where is the Ecliptic for that view, and
showing you that there is a relationship that matches. In fact, that’s one of the most astonishing things that I found while I was gathering those thousands of
photos from around the world, from fifty photographers who did not know each other, was that they would just submit the stuff to me, didn’t know each
other, and I would find that they validated each other, that it was appearing in the same place. In addition, most of the things that are showing up on those
photos are not the corpus of Planet X. It has a huge dust cloud, dozens of moons that are in various, at least 3 or 4 moon swirls which sometimes appear as
a tube and sometimes appear, if the light is scattering down in the tube, as an orb and they’ll dance around each other on some of these photos if they’re
taken in series. This is what is predominantly seen, not the corpus of Planet X itself. So there’s various aspects. And sometimes where its dust cloud is
bouncing light back into the Sun, the only thing you’re seeing is the light that comes around the edge of that dust cloud, which is refracted slightly back to
the viewer so that it appears like a large dim orb, which we call the Monster. So, those various, what we call personas, or aspects that are visible, and you
have to take that into consideration also. Next question.
LOU: [Why did you put up a picture of a kite? (../teams/rogue/nanc1720.htm)]
NANCY: Oh, a very good question. I have an excellent photographer from China, who really was gifted at capturing these personas. And like a lot of my
photographers, he came under heat, after awhile, because people were saying ‘boy, those photos from China, they’ve got me’, you know. And he was
dragged around from one country to another, and was forced to change his working hours, and the bottom line is that he finally sort of rung his hands and
said ‘I don’t look like I’ll be able to take pictures anymore’. And I heard form him very infrequently, and actually 2 and a half months went by, got
something from him, and he said ‘look at this’. And I did think it looked like a kite, but because of his long track record with me, and the like, and it came
through under the same email address, I put it up, as ‘what is this?’ Well, after it was ‘hahaha that’s a kite’ I went back and compared his email where he
submitted that to his prior emails, which I put on the page. You can go and find that among the photos. Didn’t remove it, put in my explanation. The font
was different, it was indented. One thing, he never spoke in perfect English, he spoke in very broken English, in fact was German. And I knew that but the
public didn’t know that, because I corrected his broken English. But in this particular email that submitted the kite photo, he spoke in perfect English. It was
not from that guy. Consequently, it was a forgery. This is the type of attack that ZetaTalk is put under. I’m very overworked, very tired, dealing with huge
amounts of information and trying to get it out there for people, and that slipped by me. But when something like that happens, I put an explanation and
leave it there for people to see the track record. This is more an indictment to the debunkers, than it is to me or the photographers.
LOU: [Why not even one pictures on your web site not explained as man made, lens flare, or atmospheric object?]
NANCY: Well the thing is you can do anything in PhotoShop, but I would suggest that people go and look at that page I’ve prepared for tonight. When
you page down, into page Gentile Updates, the one for Dec 12, 2003 has a Second Sun photograph from South Africa. And by the way, Ferdinand, that
was the last picture he sent to me, finally heard from him, I was glad to hear that he wasn’t dead, it was so exceptional, that he got heat, and didn’t hear
from him for almost a year. A Second Sun. That’s not one light source there, and that’s not a lens flare either. So I would recommend that people find out
for themselves, go in and look through the photos and click around and just see the mass of it and come to your own conclusions. Don’t listen to
JohnIsEvil, who is, I’m sure, submitting these questions to Lou Gentile under his given name, Mr. Evil, and what is his next question.
LOU: [If Earth haltetd in its orbit, where do the Zetas say the dark twin is now? (../index/lou0525.htm)]
NANCY: It came up from the West, because all the planets are sweeping along in a counterclockwise motion. And we did have photographic capture of
that. We didn’t recognize what it was at first. And people were seeing it when it was about a quarter of the way around behind us, they were seeing it as a
blue object that suddenly got large and yellow and the like, reports, and I got photos, a couple of good examples if you go into the photo section, since
May, it’s at the top of that, I put in the Signs of the Times, very dramatic. Now its a black blob like an asteroid, it’s black, has no atmosphere, no water,
and thus like NEO asteroids, we don’t see it until it’s upon us unless the light reflection is just so, and blue and yellow were a couple of spectrums that it
was reflecting. Now, it’s behind us to the West, so we see it after sundown. Matter of fact, there was a discussion on a message board just this morning
about that. Somebody was saying they saw something overhead as the Sun was going down, well that would be where the Ecliptic would put an object that
was coming behind us. It was not a planet, it was not a star, unidentified, and he was seeing it regularly for the last 2 weeks driving home. Well, it might just
be the dark twin. Next question.
LOU: [Since you claim to have so many followers, why it is that not one amateur astronomer has taken a good picture of PX based on the coordinates
provided?]
NANCY: Well actually, we were taking pictures, CCD images in 2002 and we took infrared images in the early part of 2002, January, February, and now
as soon as it became close to the Sun, between us and the Sun it’s a different matter where you had to use welder’s lens and the like to filter, in order to
see the components of Planet X like the Moon Swirls and the like dancing around. Many of the people that submit photos to me are amateur astronomers.
And I have also heard from astronomers who are not at liberty to give me photos nor am I at liberty to reveal their names. So, that’s my answer to that.
Next question.
LOU: [We can skip this one. Um, why does light from PX behave differently than any other light in the Universe?]
NANCY: But it does. Look at these SWAN images that I have on this month’s update. Now they have a comet in there that is tracking down toward the
lower right in these images, and it matches the RA and Dec, which is by the way for those who don’t know those terms, the X and Y in the sky. Now that
comet is not emitting light, it may be outgassing or it may not, but it’s reflecting sunlight back behind the Sun, and is thus picked up on the backlit, as is
Planet X. It’s the same light spectrum. Why do you think we have so much glare from the Sun. All the sunlight bouncing around in the dust cloud around
Planet X, but more than that, the additional light from Planet X itself. There was a newspaper article recently about the Arctic glow, for the last 5 years and
increasingly so to the point where it finally hit the news. Way up there on the N. Pole where they like to go out in the light of the Moon to catch seals or
whatever because it’s just pitch dark no daylight whatsoever. It never gets past twilight now, it’s twilight all the time, and everybody is scratching their head.
The only solution that they could come up with was bouncing off of an air mass if there’s an inversion where cold air is above warm air. Well, all the time? I
mean, this has been a daily thing being reported. So that’s not it. Where do you think that extra light comes from? From Planet X. OK, next question.