Mail this Page
Clinton Obama Hand Count 34.818% 38.706% Machine Count 39.755% 36.398% No Method Stated 45.266% 30.611%
Was New Hampshire compromised? Election statistics point out that where hand counting was done, the lead expected by Obama held. Where
counted by Diebold, Hillary unaccountably won. The polls going into the caucus had Obama ahead by at least 10 points, and exit polls
substantiated this. This was the margin counted in those districts which hand counted results. Clearly, something is suspect. Indeed, there was
enough warning ahead of time that Hillary was going to lose, and lose big. This would propel her descent into oblivion, from her current position
where she was already teetering on the brink. It is not by accident that the same voter fraud techniques used to assure Bush the Presidency in
2000 and 2004 were used to assure Hillary a win in the New Hampshire primary. She has been accused by Obama of being "Bush Lite", in that
she is cooperative with the lobbyists, and voted to give Bush the powers he wanted in both Iraq and now Iran. The Clintons have thrown in with
the Bush family, agreeing to support each other, which should come as no surprise if one has watched the news - George Herbert Bush and Bill
Clinton, together in Indonesia after the devastating quake in Christmas, 2004. So much camaraderie after so many years as opponents.
Will the Democratic primary then be fixed? Not hardly. The Puppet Master, who desires the Bush/Cheney administration to be politically
decapitated, is hardly interested in a replacement crew. He wanted Kerry to win, and Bush stole the election, so retaliated by ensuring that the
2006 election was in accordance with the wish of the people. He wants the US out of the Middle East, so the oil fields can be protected by
whomever emerges as the dominant power there. He wants Bush contained, and does not want a proxy setup as a puppet of Bush. He will now
intervene, we predict, in the manner he did in 2006, to ensure valid elections. Obama appears to him as someone with whom he can negotiate,
someone with whom he can find common interests such as preserving the economy and sustaining industrial capacity. His monitors knew voter
fraud was a possibility, per our warnings, but did not act in time. They won't be taken by surprise a second time, we predict.
- NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
January 9, 2008
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530- The way the ballots are counted in New Hampshire, largely on Diebold optical-scan voting systems, wholly controlled and programmed by a very very bad company named LHS Associates. The pre-election pollster's numbers were dead-on, for the most part, on the Republican side, as well as on the Democratic side. Except in the do-or-die (for Hillary) Clinton v. Obama race. As you'll note, the numbers in Zogby's latest polls, for all but Clinton and Obama, seem to have been dead-on the money for both the Republicans and Democrats. Edwards, for example, was polled at 17% in Zogby's poll, and he received exactly 17% in the MSNBC numbers, with 63% of precincts reporting. So are we to believe that only those voters who preferred Obama previously, decided to change to Hillary at the last minute? Some 40% of New Hampshire's precincts are hand-counted, which equals about 25% of the votes. All the rest are counted on hackable Diebold op-scan systems, with completely hackable memory cards, all programmed and managed by LHS Associates. As Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org who seems to share my concern, says, LHS is the "chain of custody" in New Hampshire elections.